AI Governance · NIST AI RMF 1.0 Readiness
The EU AI Act's Article 50 transparency obligations begin applying August 2, 2026 — and they reach further than most teams think. If your business uses AI with customers, ships AI features, or generates AI content, the honest first question isn't “are we compliant?” It's “do we actually know how we're using AI?” That's an AI-governance question — and it's measurable.
Article 50 of the EU AI Act sets transparency obligations for certain AI systems — in plain terms: people must be told when they're interacting with an AI system (like a chatbot) rather than a human; AI-generated or AI-manipulated content, including deepfakes, must be disclosed and marked; and uses like emotion recognition must be disclosed to the people exposed to them. These duties can reach US companies whose AI systems are offered in the EU market or whose outputs are used there — the same long-arm pattern GDPR established.
Even if the EU never touches your business, the direction of travel is unmistakable: US states, the FTC, insurers, and your own enterprise customers are converging on the same demand — show us you know what your AI does, where it's used, and who's accountable for it. That's exactly what an AI-governance readiness assessment measures.
Most small and mid-size businesses either do nothing (“that's an EU problem”) or reach for an expensive consultant to “do AI compliance.” Both are mistakes for the same reason: you can't prioritize what you haven't measured. The cheap, fast first move is an honest inventory of your AI use, mapped against a recognized framework — then fix the highest-impact gaps first.
Answer a short set of questions about how your business uses AI. Get an immediate, honest read on your governance posture against NIST AI RMF 1.0 — the US government's AI risk-management framework — and which gaps matter most. No sales call, no credit card.
A documented, evidence-based AI-governance gap report: your AI-use inventory, where you stand control-by-control against NIST AI RMF 1.0, transparency-practice gaps (the Article 50 pattern), and a prioritized remediation roadmap you can hand your team — or your counsel.
Map your actual AI use and see your top governance gaps in minutes.
A prioritized, documented AI-governance gap report for $299.
Work the ranked list — and monitor drift as your AI use grows with SupervEyes.
Honest by design. This is a readiness assessment, not legal advice and not a certification. We measure your AI-governance posture against NIST AI RMF 1.0 and flag transparency-practice gaps; we do not issue legal determinations about the EU AI Act or any law — that's a question for your counsel, and we'll tell you plainly when you need one. An honest picture of where you stand is the point.
It can — if your AI systems are offered in the EU or their outputs are used there, the same way GDPR reached US companies. Whether it applies to you is a legal question for counsel. What we measure is the governance layer underneath: whether you know your AI use, control it, and could demonstrate it.
NIST AI RMF 1.0 — the US National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework. It's the emerging common language for AI governance in the US, and its Govern/Map/Measure/Manage structure covers the same ground the transparency rules care about: knowing what your AI does, and being able to show it.
Yes — and that's the most common blind spot. Staff AI use, AI features in vendor products, and AI-generated content in your marketing all count. The free read starts with exactly this inventory.
Same honest methodology, same format: scoped controls, a readiness score, and a prioritized gap list. AI RMF is one of the nine frameworks we cover — if it turns out a different one fits your obligations better, the free scoping will tell you that plainly.
A service of All-American Tech Services LLC, a Missouri company operating since 2015. Every framework is reconciled control-by-control against its authoritative source; we never reproduce copyrighted control text, and readiness is never sold as certification or legal advice. A readiness assessment is not a validating assessment, an attestation, or a legal compliance determination.